Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tihomir Grozdanov vs Victor-Mugurel Anagnastopol Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Grozdanov vs Anagnastopol analysis and find out who is favored!
Tihomir Grozdanov vs Victor-Mugurel Anagnastopol Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Grozdanov 1 - 1 Anagnastopol
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Grozdanov has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Anagnastopol has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Grozdanov, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Anagnastopol has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Grozdanov has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Anagnastopol has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Grozdanov has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Anagnastopol winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Grozdanov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 179/ 135), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 13/ 14). Anagnastopol has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Grozdanov winning 1 times and Anagnastopol being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Grozdanov winning 2 and Anagnastopol winning 2. The last match between Grozdanov and Anagnastopol was at the Bulgaria F1 (Sozopol), 10-05-2017, First, Hard with Tihomir Grozdanov getting the victory 6-1 2-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Grozdanov and Anagnastopol have played a deciding set 0 times, with Grozdanov winning 0 times and Anagnastopol 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Grozdanov winning 0, and Anagnastopol 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Grozdanov has played against opponents with an average rank of while Anagnastopol has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Grozdanov has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Anagnastopol has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Grozdanov has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Anagnastopol has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
394
High
37
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
469
High
38
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
55% (219-178)
Career Total W/L
51% (130-123)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$600
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Grozdanov VS Anagnastopol H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Tihomir Grozdanov | Victor-Mugurel Anagnastopol |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 13 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:15:0 | 0:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 47% (14/30) | 55% (12/22) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (10/14) | 17% (2/12) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (10/16) | 20% (2/10) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 82% (18/22) | 33% (10/30) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Grozdanov VS Anagnastopol H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 2-0 ret. |
Stats 
Tihomir Grozdanov
Player
Victor-Mugurel Anagnastopol
47%
(
14 of
30)
1st Serve %
55%
(
12 of
22)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
10 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
82%
(
18 of
22)
38
Total Points Won
14
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tihomir Grozdanov | Victor-Mugurel Anagnastopol |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tihomir Grozdanov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Tihomir Grozdanov
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tihomir Grozdanov
Player
Vasil Yehorov
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Tihomir Grozdanov
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tihomir Grozdanov
Player
Skyler Butts
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tihomir Grozdanov
Player
Jannik Rother
46%
(
37 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Victor-Mugurel Anagnastopol Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Bortolotti
Player
Victor-Mugurel Anagnastopol
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve %
52%
(
12 of
23)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
32
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dragos Dima
Player
Victor-Mugurel Anagnastopol
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 5-7 6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tihomir Grozdanov
Player
Victor-Mugurel Anagnastopol
47%
(
14 of
30)
1st Serve %
55%
(
12 of
22)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
10 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
82%
(
18 of
22)
38
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Grozdanov Vs Anagnastopol Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
